Keine Bearbeitungszusammenfassung |
(Eine verständliche Lösung) |
||
Zeile 218: | Zeile 218: | ||
luaL_dostring(L, buf); | luaL_dostring(L, buf); | ||
} | |||
</pre> | |||
C++11: | |||
<pre> | |||
#include <vector> | |||
#include <string> | |||
#include <cstdlib> | |||
#include <fstream> | |||
using namespace std; | |||
int main(){ | |||
vector<string> flo={"dividuum", "syb", "fiji", "flowhase", "florolf", "piratenflo"}; | |||
ofstream cpp_2("cpp_2.cpp"); | |||
cpp_2<<"#include <iostream>\n#include <string> \nusing namespace std;\nint main(){"; | |||
for(int i=0;i<flo.size();++i){ | |||
cpp_2<<"string flo"<<i<<" =\""<<flo[i]<<"\";\n"; | |||
} | |||
cpp_2<<"cout"; | |||
for(int i=0;i<flo.size();++i){ | |||
cpp_2<<"<< flo"<<i; | |||
if(i+1==flo.size()){ | |||
cpp_2<<"<<endl\n"; | |||
} | |||
else{ | |||
cpp_2<<"<<\", \"\n"; | |||
} | |||
} | |||
cpp_2<<";}"<<endl; | |||
cpp_2.close(); | |||
system("g++ cpp_2.cpp -o cpp_2; ./cpp_2"); | |||
return 0; | |||
} | } | ||
</pre> | </pre> | ||
Zeile 347: | Zeile 381: | ||
} | } | ||
</pre> | </pre> | ||
== Fußnoten == | == Fußnoten == |
Version vom 7. Februar 2012, 18:39 Uhr
Wir sind die Flo, Widerstand ist zwecklos!
Beiträge, die die Anforderungen erfüllen
#!/usr/bin/env ruby flo = [ "dividuum", "syb", "fiji", "flowhase", "florolf", "piratenflo" ] # flos sind keine arrayss1! for i in 0..flo.size-1 eval "flo#{i} = flo[#{i}]" puts "flo#{i} == \"" + eval("flo#{i}") + "\"" end
Dieses Perl (*duck*) kann ja keiner lesen!1) Daher:
Dreckiges C:
#include <stdio.h> #include <stdlib.h> #include <errno.h> #include <unistd.h> const int flolen = 6; static const char *flos[] = {"dividuum","syb","fiji","flowhase","florolf", "piratenflo"}; static const char *proghead = "#include <stdio.h>\nint main(void){\n"; static const char *progend = " return(0);\n}\n"; int main(void){ int i; FILE *o; o=fopen("flo2.c","w"); fputs(proghead,o); for(i=0;i<flolen;i++){ fprintf(o," char *flo%d = \"%s\";\n",i,flos[i]); fprintf(o," printf(\"flo%%d ist %%s\\n\",%d,flo%d);\n",i,i); } fputs(progend,o); fclose(o); system("/usr/bin/gcc -o flos flo2.c;./flos;rm -f flo2.c flos"); return 0; }
Nu aber wirklich noch in Perl:
#!/usr/bin/perl @flo = ( "dividuum", "syb", "fiji", "flowhase", "florolf", "piratenflo" ); for $i (0..$#flo) { eval "\$flo$i = \$flo\[$i\]"; print "\$flo$i eq \"" . eval("\$flo$i") . "\"\n"; }
Perl:
#!/usr/bin/perl @flo = ( "dividuum", "syb", "fiji", "flowhase", "florolf", "piratenflo" ); for $i (0..$#flo) { ${"flo$i"} = $flo[$i]; print "\$flo$i eq \"" . ${"flo$i"} . "\"\n"; }
PHP:
<?php $flo = array( "dividuum", "syb", "fiji", "flowhase", "florolf", "piratenflo" ); foreach ($flo as $i => $x) { ${"flo$i"} = $flo[$i]; echo "\$flo$i = \"" . ${"flo$i"} . "\"\n"; } ?>
Gute alte Bash:
#!/bin/sh flo="dividuum syb fiji flowhase florolf piratenflo" n=0 for f in $flo do eval flo$n=$f echo -n "flo$n == " eval echo \$flo$n n=$(($n+1)) done
Realisiert in PHP, Lisp, Perl, XML, Bash und XSLT und immernoch kürzer als die C-Version:
<?php $flo = array( "dividuum", "syb", "fiji", "flowhase", "florolf", "piratenflo" ); $l = fopen("flo.lisp", "w"); $p = fopen("flo.pl", "w"); fwrite($l, '(progn (format t "~a" "<flo>")'); fwrite($p,' print <<EOF <xsl:stylesheet version="1.0" xmlns:xsl="http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Transform" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/strict"> <xsl:template match="/">'); for($i=0;$i<count($flo);$i++) { fwrite($l, "(format t \"~a~a~a\" \"<flo$i>\" \"$flo[$i]\" \"</flo$i>\")"); fwrite($p, "flo$i == <xsl:value-of select=\"flo/flo$i\"/>\n"); } fwrite($l, '(format t "~a" "</flo>"))'); fwrite($p,' </xsl:template> </xsl:stylesheet> EOF'."\n"); fclose($l); fclose($p); system("sbcl --noinform --load flo.lisp --eval '(quit)' > flo.xml"); system("perl flo.pl > flo.xslt"); system("xsltproc flo.xslt flo.xml | grep -v xml"); ?> |
http://static.php.net/www.php.net/images/news/php-logo.gif http://www.mail-archive.com/copenhagen@perl.org/msg00162/logo_mermaid.png |
Noch einmal in Ruby:
#!/usr/bin/env ruby flo = [ "dividuum", "syb", "fiji", "flowhase", "florolf", "piratenflo" ] # flos sind keine arrayss1! flo.each_with_index do | f, i | instance_variable_set "@flo#{i}", f puts "flo#{i} = #{instance_variable_get "@flo#{i}"}" end
'cause JavaScript rocks:
flo = new Array("dividuum", "syb", "fiji", "flowhase", "florolf", "piratenflo"); for (i in flo) { eval("flo"+i+" = flo["+i+"]"); dump("flo"+i+" == "+eval("flo"+i)+"\n"); }
Wir moegen Lua:
#include <lua.h> #include <lualib.h> #include <lauxlib.h> lua_State *L; char *flos[] = {"dividuum", "syb", "fiji", "flowhase", "florolf", "piratenflo"}; char buf[1024]; void main() { char *p; int i; L = luaL_newstate(); luaL_openlibs(L); for(i=0; i < 6; i++) { sprintf(buf, "flo%d", i); lua_pushstring(L, flos[i]); lua_setglobal(L, buf); } p=buf; for(i=0; i < 6; i++) p += sprintf(p, "print(\"flo%d = \" .. flo%d);", i, i); luaL_dostring(L, buf); }
C++11:
#include <vector> #include <string> #include <cstdlib> #include <fstream> using namespace std; int main(){ vector<string> flo={"dividuum", "syb", "fiji", "flowhase", "florolf", "piratenflo"}; ofstream cpp_2("cpp_2.cpp"); cpp_2<<"#include <iostream>\n#include <string> \nusing namespace std;\nint main(){"; for(int i=0;i<flo.size();++i){ cpp_2<<"string flo"<<i<<" =\""<<flo[i]<<"\";\n"; } cpp_2<<"cout"; for(int i=0;i<flo.size();++i){ cpp_2<<"<< flo"<<i; if(i+1==flo.size()){ cpp_2<<"<<endl\n"; } else{ cpp_2<<"<<\", \"\n"; } } cpp_2<<";}"<<endl; cpp_2.close(); system("g++ cpp_2.cpp -o cpp_2; ./cpp_2"); return 0; }
Bloatiger Angebercode, der auch noch etwas völlig anderes macht
Und nochmal das, was das Ruby-Programm "mit viel bloatigem Metaprogramming-Foo" macht, allerdings wiederum in Common Lisp gegossen:
(Warnung: (Zumindest) als Lispprogramm ist dieses Beispiel ziemlich unsinning, und z.B. die PRINT-OBJECT-Methode widerspricht der gängigen Konvention.)
Ru^W Objektorientiertes C
// Das aendern: #include "/usr/local/lib/ruby/1.8/i386-freebsd5/ruby.h" VALUE flo_init(VALUE self) { char *flo[] = {"dividuum", "syb", "fiji", "flowhase", "florolf", "piratenflo"}; int i; for(i = 0; i < 6; i++) { char varname[7]; sprintf(varname, "@flo%i", i); // Insecure! rb_iv_set(self, varname, rb_str_new2(flo[i])); } } VALUE flo_each(VALUE self) { int i; VALUE vars = rb_funcall(self, rb_intern("instance_variables"), 0); VALUE varname = rb_ary_shift(vars); while(varname != Qnil) { rb_yield(rb_ary_new3(2, varname, rb_iv_get(self, RSTRING(varname)->ptr))); varname = rb_ary_shift(vars); } return(Qnil); } int main() { VALUE flo; ruby_init(); flo = rb_define_class("Flo", rb_cObject); rb_define_method(flo, "initialize", flo_init, 0); rb_define_method(flo, "each", flo_each, 0); rb_eval_string("Flo.new.each { |name,value| puts \"#{name.gsub(/^@/, '')} = #{value}\" }"); return(0); }
Fußnoten
1) Anmerkung zu: "Dieses Perl (*duck*) kann ja keiner lesen!"
Stimmt doch gar nicht! Ist ganz einfach:
map printf("%s = %s\n", [flo0..flo5]->[$_], [dividuum, syb, fiji, flowhase, florolf, piratenflo]->[$_]), 0..$#{@{[flo0..flo5]}};
(Kommentar von mgr: Genau, "0..$#{@{[flo0..flo5]}}" ... q.e.d. Danke für das gute Beispiel. Aber ernsthaft, es ging hier eben gerade *nicht* um Einzeiler, die will niemand.)
Und auch in python kann man Einzeiler schreiben:
print "\n".join(["%s = %s" % (k, v) for k, v in {"flo0":"dividuum", "flo1":"syb", "flo2":"fiji", "flo3":"flowhase","flo4":"florolf", "flo5":"piratenflo"}.items()])